Unseen Photos: Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas Release Photos With 'Hello! Canada'

Lewis Collier
December 6, 2018

The Cut took a big swing at the outrageously acquisitive wedding of Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas. The couple had a short courtship, after which they made a decision to tie the knot on December 1 and 2 in a Christian and Hindu wedding ceremony.

Meanwhile, Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas got married in a lavish wedding ceremony at the glittering Umaid Bhavan Palace in Jodhpur. The couple speaks about tying the knot within months of dating one another. She said, "I don't even want to react or comment".

According to the report in Hindustan Times, Priyanka has responded to the article saying she did not want to react to such "random things". @TheCut should be ashamed to have someone write such evil words. It's not even in my stratosphere.

Sensitive internal Facebook documents published by UK Parliament
The UK parliament's fake news inquiry has published a cache of seized Facebook documents. But the facts are clear: "we've never sold people's data".

Everyone knows that Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas' relationship is nothing but true love and we're glad that a lot of people took a stand against hatred by supporting PeeCee and Nick. What Nick & Pri have is Beautiful Love.

The predictable monsoon of Twitter criticism became somewhat awkward when "Game of Thrones" star and Chopra's soon-to-be-sister-in-law Sophie Turner tweeted, "this is wildly inappropriate and totally disgusting. Very disappointed that The Cut would give anyone a platform to spew such bullshit". It reeks of envy and bitterness. We've received dozens of messages from readers expressing their anger. There is no good explanation for this other than human error and poor judgement. The piece, that was first published on Tuesday, reportedly called Priyanka a "global scam artist" and insinuated that she is using Nick to strengthen her foothold in Hollywood. The same could be read as, "An earlier story about Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas did not meet our standards. We've removed it and apologise".

Other reports by

Discuss This Article